- Our Stores
- University Avenue
- About
- The Move
- The Co-op Turns 50!
- Sale Books
- View all sale books
- Or browse by section:
- American History
- African History
- African-American History
- Anthologies
- Anthropology
- Art and Art History
- Cartography
- Chicago
- Cognitive Science
- Drama
- East Asian History
- Economics
- European History
- Foreign Language Reference and Instruction
- Graphica
- Humor
- Judaica
- Literary Criticism
- Literature
- Mathematics
- Native American Studies
- Poetry
- Psychology
- Science
- Sociology
- South Asian History
- Theology
- Travel
- Miscellaneous
- Coursebook Ordering
- U of C Coursebook Listings
- 57th Street Books
- The Newberry Library Bookstore
- Hours and Contact Information
- Maps and Directions
- University Avenue
- Co-op Membership
- Coursebooks
- Events
- The Front Table Blog
- New Titles
- Your Account
Description
The most important literary dispute of the Renaissance pitted those writers of Neo-Latin who favored imitation of Cicero alone, as the single best exemplar of Latin prose, against those who preferred to follow an eclectic array of literary models. This Ciceronian controversy is the subject of the texts collected for the first time in this volume: exchanges of letters between Angelo Poliziano and Paolo Cortesi; between Gianfrancesco Pico della Mirandola and Pietro Bembo; and between Giovambattista Giraldi Cinzio and his mentor Celio Calcagnini. A postscript by Lilio Gregorio Giraldi and writings by Antonio Possevino comment further on this correspondence.
Because they address some of the most fundamental aspects of literary production, these quarrels shed light on similar debates about vernacular literature, which also turned on imitation and the role of the author. The Ciceronian controversy can also be seen as part of larger cultural movements, such as the choice of vernacular language over Latin, the development of Jesuit pedagogy, and the religious conflicts that characterized much of the Renaissance.




